The offer
A price reduction compares two prices: the current price and the previous one.
PRICE MONITORING
01 / 08The offer
A handbag at £198, with the earlier price crossed out: £398. They assume they are saving £200.
02 / 08The advert
The advert promises 50% off and gives a “was” price: £398. A price statement in an advert must not mislead. The question is when the handbag actually cost that much.
03 / 08The online shop
The shop raised the price to £398 for seven days and then crossed it out. For the other 23 days of the month the same handbag cost £210.
04 / 08The rule
Great Britain has no fixed 30-day rule: the law treats false or misleading information, or a misleading overall presentation, as a misleading action (Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, section 226). The advertising regulator looks at how long the higher price was charged and expects advertisers to provide at least three months of pricing history. Here £398 was charged for seven days: the usual price was £210.
05 / 08Sales events
Raising the price shortly before Black Friday does not make it the usual price. In 2026 the Advertising Standards Authority ruled that a Black Friday “was” price charged for only 21 days was misleading.
06 / 08The imbalance
The “−50%” takes the clicks from the shop that keeps its price all month, even though the real difference is a few pounds.
07 / 08Monitoring
We record the price of every product we monitor, with a screenshot, date, time and URL. When the offer arrives, the history already exists.
08 / 08The report
The report serves the shopper who doubts an offer, the small retailer who wants to audit a larger rival and the company monitoring rivals that discount off inflated prices. Where there are adverts, we submit the case file to the advertising platform; you or your adviser can report it to Trading Standards through Citizens Advice, or complain to the Advertising Standards Authority.
A saving is proved by the price history. Not by the label.
IN SHORT
The shop raised the price to £398 for seven days and then crossed it out. For the other 23 days of the month the same handbag cost £210.
A price reduction compares two prices: the current price and the previous one.
The earlier price also appears in adverts, crossed out or as a percentage.
Some shops raise the price for a few days so they can cross it out.
A “was” price must be the genuine usual selling price.
Black Friday is no exception: the same test applies.
VigiaLabs records the price every day, so the history exists before the offer does.
OUR APPROACH
Competitive context to review positioning and support recommendations with examples.
We record the price of every product we monitor, with a screenshot, date, time and URL. When the offer arrives, the history already exists.
Great Britain has no fixed 30-day rule: the law treats false or misleading information, or a misleading overall presentation, as a misleading action (Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, section 226). The advertising regulator looks at how long the higher price was charged and expects advertisers to provide at least three months of pricing history. Here £398 was charged for seven days: the usual price was £210.
The report serves the shopper who doubts an offer, the small retailer who wants to audit a larger rival and the company monitoring rivals that discount off inflated prices. Where there are adverts, we submit the case file to the advertising platform; you or your adviser can report it to Trading Standards through Citizens Advice, or complain to the Advertising Standards Authority.
WHO IT IS FOR
Price monitoring is available to individuals and to businesses of any size.
Before you buy, check what the product really cost over the past few weeks. If the saving does not add up, you have the history and the screenshots to back up a complaint.
Audit your larger competitors: check whether their campaigns start from prices that were genuinely charged. The Advertising Standards Authority accepts complaints from competitors, who must first show that they tried to resolve the matter with the advertiser.
Monitor rivals that advertise discounts off inflated prices, in their shops and in their adverts, and document each case with a date, time and screenshot.
WHAT APPLIES IN THE UNITED KINGDOM
Great Britain has no 30-day rule like the European one. Its law avoids prescriptive rules and relies on general principles of fair dealing, so the evidence that matters is the price history.
The CAP Code says that price statements must not mislead and that price comparisons must not falsely claim a price advantage (rules 3.17 and 3.39). The Advertising Standards Authority expects a “was” price to be the genuine usual selling price, generally charged for longer than the promotional price, and asks advertisers for at least three months of pricing history.
False or misleading information about a product, or an overall presentation likely to deceive the average consumer, is a misleading action (Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, section 226). Trading Standards guidance lists what makes a reference price genuine: how long the higher price was charged compared with the promotion, how recently it was charged, whether it was charged in the same channel and whether significant sales were made at that price. The Competition and Markets Authority can impose fines of up to £300,000 or, if higher, 10% of global turnover.
In May 2026 the Advertising Standards Authority published a group of rulings on Black Friday promotions found by its own monitoring: one “was” price that had been charged for only 21 days was held to be misleading. Falsely stating that an offer is available only for a limited time is banned in all circumstances (Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, Schedule 20, paragraph 7).
Official sources consulted on 6 and 7 October 2026.
The rule
Great Britain has no fixed 30-day rule: the law treats false or misleading information, or a misleading overall presentation, as a misleading action (Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024, section 226). The advertising regulator looks at how long the higher price was charged and expects advertisers to provide at least three months of pricing history. Here £398 was charged for seven days: the usual price was £210.
Sales eventsRaising the price shortly before Black Friday does not make it the usual price. In 2026 the Advertising Standards Authority ruled that a Black Friday “was” price charged for only 21 days was misleading.
GLOSSARY
Every case is documented with sources and context. Scope is agreed for each market; the references on this page are to the law of the United Kingdom.
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
The “−50%” takes the clicks from the shop that keeps its price all month. A dated price history helps those who do not inflate prices to compete on equal terms.
By comparing the “was” price with the genuine usual selling price. Great Britain has no fixed 30-day rule: the Advertising Standards Authority looks at how long the higher price was charged and expects advertisers to provide at least three months of pricing history. VigiaLabs records the price of every monitored product each day, with a screenshot, date, time and URL: when the offer arrives, the history already exists.
Document it with a dated price history. The Advertising Standards Authority accepts complaints from competitors, who must first show that they tried to resolve the matter with the advertiser. Where there are adverts, VigiaLabs submits the case file to the advertising platform; you or your adviser can complain to the Advertising Standards Authority or report it to Trading Standards through Citizens Advice.
No, Great Britain has no fixed 30-day rule, but Black Friday is no exception: a “was” price must be the genuine usual selling price, and raising the price shortly before does not make it so. In May 2026 the Advertising Standards Authority published a group of rulings on Black Friday promotions: one “was” price charged for only 21 days was held to be misleading.
Yes. Price monitoring is available to individuals and to businesses of any size. A consumer checks what the product really cost before buying; a small retailer audits whether larger competitors’ campaigns start from prices that were genuinely charged. In both cases there are a price history and screenshots to back up a complaint.
Yes. A percentage, a crossed-out price or a “was/now” in an advert is a savings claim: a statement that presents a price as reduced. The CAP Code says that price statements must not mislead and that price comparisons must not falsely claim a price advantage (rules 3.17 and 3.39), and the Advertising Standards Authority expects a “was” price to be the genuine usual selling price.
LET’S LOOK FURTHER
Tell us what you want to monitor. Together, we will define a scope that makes sense for your business.
A focused conversation about your goals, markets and priorities.